In‑Depth 365.stream Crypto Exchange Review - Fees, Trust & Alternatives
365.stream Crypto Exchange Comparison Tool
365.stream Overview
Fee Range: 0.08% - 0.04% (claimed)
Trust Score: Low - Warning from Revain.org
User Rating: 3/5 (1 review)
Languages: Not disclosed
Recommended Alternatives
Binance: 0.10% - 0.02% | 4.6/5 stars
Coinbase: 0.50% | 4.3/5 stars
Kraken: 0.26% - 0.00% | 4.2/5 stars
Compare Fee Structures
Estimated Monthly Fees:
Trust Assessment Guide
Red Flags
- No public security details
- Explicit trust warnings
- Limited user reviews
- No regulatory compliance info
Trust Indicators
- Regular security audits
- Regulatory licensing
- Large user base
- Transparent fee structure
Recommendation
Use established exchanges for large holdings.
365.stream may suit low-volume traders only.
When a new crypto exchange pops up, the first questions are always the same: Is it cheap enough? and Can I trust it with my funds? 365.stream review tackles both, giving you a realistic picture of what the platform delivers and where the red flags lie.
What is 365.stream?
365.stream is a multilingual cryptocurrency exchange that markets itself as a low‑fee trading hub for global users. The platform claims to support a range of major digital assets and to offer a simple UI that works across desktop and mobile browsers. However, the service’s public footprint is surprisingly thin - there are no detailed whitepapers, limited technical documentation, and only a handful of user reviews scattered across the web.
Fee Structure - The Low‑Cost Pitch
The exchange advertises a tiered fee schedule that starts at just 0.08% per trade, undercutting many established players. For high‑volume traders, fees reportedly drop to as low as 0.04%. These numbers look attractive, especially for market‑makers and arbitrage bots that churn large volumes. Yet, the fee claim lacks a transparent breakdown: there is no clear information on maker vs. taker rates, withdrawal charges, or hidden conversion fees.
Trust & Security - The Warning Signs
The biggest hurdle for 365.stream is trust. Revain.org, a respected crypto‑review platform, bluntly states that “365 dot stream exchange cannot be trusted, trading here is at your own risk.” This warning isn’t a mild disclaimer; it’s a red flag that outweighs any fee savings.
Further concerns stem from the scarcity of user feedback. Cryptogeek.info records a single 3‑out‑of‑5 rating based on one reviewer. In contrast, larger exchanges boast thousands of reviews that help users gauge reliability. The lack of a robust review base makes it hard to verify claims about security protocols, cold‑storage practices, or insurance coverage.
User Experience & Support - What Do Traders Say?
365.stream markets itself as a multilingual platform, implying support for several languages beyond English. Unfortunately, the exact language list isn’t disclosed, and the help center offers only a basic FAQ with generic answers. The single available user review notes occasional latency during peak market hours, but without a broader sample, it’s impossible to judge overall performance.
How 365.stream Stacks Up Against the Big Guys
To put the exchange in perspective, here’s a quick side‑by‑side look at a few well‑known competitors.
| Exchange | User Rating (out of 5) | Typical Fees | Trust Score | Supported Languages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 365.stream | 3 (based on 1 review) | 0.08% - 0.04% (claimed) | Low - explicit warning from Revain.org | Not disclosed |
| Binance | 4.6 (thousands of reviews) | 0.10% - 0.02% (maker/taker) | High - regular audits & insurance | English, Chinese, Spanish, Korean, Japanese, many more |
| Coinbase | 4.3 (large user base) | 0.50% (standard) | High - US regulator‑approved | English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, more |
| Kraken | 4.2 (extensive reviews) | 0.26% - 0.00% (maker) | High - strong security track record | English, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, Russian |
| CryptalDash | 5 (single review) | Varies - not disclosed | Unclear - limited data | Not listed |
| EXX | 1.2 (22 reviews) | Higher fees, uncertain reliability | Very Low - multiple complaints | Not listed |
The table makes it clear: while 365.stream advertises cheap trades, its trust score and transparency fall far behind the industry leaders.
Who Might Still Use 365.stream?
If you’re a seasoned trader who has already diversified assets across reputable exchanges, you might consider 365.stream as a secondary venue for very low‑cost trades-provided you keep only a small portion of your portfolio there. The platform could be useful for test‑trading or for accessing niche fiat‑to‑crypto pairs that larger exchanges don’t list.
However, for most users-especially newcomers-the risks outweigh the fee benefits. The lack of clear security details, coupled with a stark warning from Revain.org, makes it a gamble that many would prefer to avoid.
Safer Alternatives Worth Checking
Instead of hunting for the cheapest fee, prioritize exchanges with proven security records and regulatory compliance. Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken consistently rank high on trust, offer comprehensive customer support, and still keep fees competitive for high‑volume traders. They also provide transparent documentation on withdrawal limits, KYC/AML procedures, and insurance policies-critical data that 365.stream currently omits.
Key Takeaways
- 365.stream bills itself as a low‑fee, multilingual crypto exchange.
- Official fee claims (0.08%-0.04%) are not backed by detailed disclosures.
- Revain.org explicitly warns that the platform cannot be trusted.
- Only one user rating (3/5) is available, making reliability hard to assess.
- Established exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken offer better security, support, and overall value.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is 365.stream safe for storing large amounts of crypto?
Given the explicit trust warning from Revain.org and the lack of public security details, it’s advisable to avoid holding large balances on 365.stream. Use a reputable exchange or a hardware wallet for substantial holdings.
What fees does 365.stream actually charge?
The platform advertises 0.08% for basic trades, dropping to 0.04% for high volume. However, there is no published maker/taker split, withdrawal fees, or conversion fees, so the true cost could be higher.
How many cryptocurrencies can I trade on 365.stream?
Specific coin listings are not publicly documented. Users have reported a handful of major coins (BTC, ETH, USDT), but the full catalogue remains unclear.
Does 365.stream comply with any regulations?
There is no publicly available information about licensing, KYC/AML compliance, or jurisdictional registration. The absence of regulatory details adds to the risk profile.
Can I rely on 365.stream’s customer support?
Support is limited to a basic FAQ page. No live chat, phone line, or ticketing system is advertised, making issue resolution slower than on major exchanges.
Debra Sears
I get why low fees sound tempting, especially when you’re churning small amounts daily. However, the trust warnings you mentioned can’t be ignored. A platform that hides its security audits leaves us wondering if our assets are truly safe. If you decide to test the waters, keep only a fraction of your holdings there and move the rest to a more reputable exchange. Transparency should always come before cost savings.
Matthew Laird
Anyone who trusts a crypto exchange with that kind of warning clearly doesn’t care about American financial security.
Lara Decker
Looking at the fee claim, it’s clear they’re trying to lure low‑volume traders. Yet without maker/taker breakdown, the advertised numbers are essentially meaningless.
Anna Engel
Ah, another “low‑fee” miracle that magically appears out of nowhere-how refreshing. It’s almost as if the exchange expects us to ignore the glaring red flags because the price is cheap. Trust scores aren’t just decorative stickers; they’re the result of actual security practices, which apparently this platform lacks. In the grand theatre of crypto, 365.stream seems to be playing the role of the understudy who never got a script.
Marcus Henderson
When assessing whether to place funds on a nascent exchange, the first principle to honor is the preservation of capital. Low transaction fees, while attractive on paper, cannot compensate for the potential loss of principal resulting from inadequate security measures. The absence of publicly available audit reports suggests that the platform may not have undergone the rigorous testing that major exchanges routinely publish. Furthermore, the lack of regulatory licensing removes a layer of consumer protection that is otherwise enforced by competent authorities. In practice, this creates a scenario where users are left without recourse should funds be compromised or the service become insolvent. It is also worth noting that the exchange’s minimal user feedback-only a single three‑star rating-provides an insufficient data set for any statistically meaningful risk assessment. A robust exchange typically offers extensive documentation on cold‑storage protocols, insurance coverage, and incident response strategies; none of which are evident here. The fee structure, advertised as 0.08% down to 0.04%, does not disclose whether these rates are maker or taker, nor does it clarify withdrawal costs, which can erode the perceived savings. For high‑volume traders, marginal fee differences are often outweighed by the operational stability and confidence derived from a proven security framework. In contrast, a platform that cannot substantiate its security claims effectively demands that users price in a risk premium far exceeding the nominal fee advantage. Consequently, the prudent approach is to allocate only a marginal portion of one’s portfolio to such an unproven venue, if at all, while maintaining the bulk of assets on exchanges with transparent security practices and regulatory compliance. This strategy balances the desire to experiment with fee savings against the overarching imperative to safeguard capital. Ultimately, the decision should be guided by a thorough evaluation of both cost and credibility, with a bias toward the latter.
Jason Wuchenich
Your caution is wise; keeping most of your crypto on a well‑known exchange reduces exposure. If you still want to explore 365.stream, treat it as a sandbox for tiny trades. Remember, the platform’s limited support could delay problem resolution, so stay vigilant.
Andrew Lin
Look, u cant just believe any site that doesnt show audit logs – that's stupid. 365.stream is just another sketchy outfit tryin to pull a fast one on dumb traders. If u care about ur money, stick with the big boys like Binance or Coinbase.
Jasmine Kate
So you’re thinking about dropping your coins into 365.stream? Brace yourself for a roller‑coaster-low fees on the surface, but the hidden pits could swallow your assets whole. It’s the kind of drama that makes your heart race and then... nope, your portfolio vanishes.
Franceska Willis
Yo, I dived into that 365.stream thing and it felt like wade through murky water-nothing clear, just weird vibes. The fee talk? Sure, cheap, but the trust score screams 'run!'. If you love living on the edge, go ahead, but most folks would rather sip a safe latte than gamble with their crypto.
EDWARD SAKTI PUTRA
I understand the appeal of cutting fees, especially when margins are thin. Still, the uncertainty around security is a heavy burden to carry. Choosing a platform with proven safeguards can give you peace of mind that outweighs a few basis points saved.
Heather Zappella
The lack of disclosed languages on 365.stream raises concerns about accessibility for non‑English speakers. Moreover, without clear KYC and AML policies, regulatory compliance remains questionable. Users should prioritize exchanges that publish comprehensive security audits and maintain transparent documentation. This ensures both legal conformity and user protection.
Kate O'Brien
People think it's just another exchange but there's something off. They hide the facts like the big ones do, maybe even work with secret groups. Better stay away until we know who's really running it.
Ricky Xibey
Short answer: not worth the risk for most traders.
Caitlin Eliason
Do we really want to gamble with our savings on a platform that the community flags as unsafe? The moral of the story is clear-cheap doesn't equal safe. 🤨
Melanie LeBlanc
Picture this: you slip a tiny portion of your portfolio into 365.stream, hoping the low fees will boost returns. The reality? A platform that barely whispers its security measures, leaving you holding your breath. In contrast, established exchanges shout their audits from the rooftops. If you value both creativity and safety, stick with the proven houses and treat 365.stream as a curiosity, not a cornerstone.
Nicholas Kulick
The fee claim lacks transparency; without maker/taker details, the actual cost remains uncertain.
manika nathaemploy
i get why ppl chase lower fees but trust issue is a big red flag. dont risk ur whole portfolio on something that wont share a simple security plan.
Mark Bosky
It would be prudent to evaluate 365.stream against established criteria such as regulatory licensing, audited security protocols, and transparent fee structures. Only after satisfying these benchmarks should one consider allocating any substantial assets to the platform.
Richard Bocchinfuso
If you think 365.stream is a good idea, you clearly dont know any better. Stick with the big names or you’ll end up broke.